Have You Ever Thrown Good Money After Bad Money?

As business owners, we’d like to think that we make rational, logical decisions when it comes to our business finances. However, scientists have discovered that we have built-in biases in our brains and our thinking processes, and one of these biases is the sunk cost bias. 


A sunk cost is simply money, time, or resources that you have already spent and can’t get back. The bias comes into the picture when we consider those costs in future decisions. 


One example is when you have already invested a lot of time and money in a losing project. You continue to do so even if the benefits are not worth it. Let’s say you have spent a lot on car repairs. You continue to repair the car, digging a deeper and deeper hole. Buying a new car would be the better decision because the benefits would outweigh the costs, but you are still emotionally (and irrationally) attached to all the money you spent on the clunker.


You can also fall into the sunk cost trap with relationships. Let’s say you have an employee that is a borderline performer. You keep investing in them, thinking you can “fix” them, and they don’t improve. You should have fired them a long time ago! 


Scientists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky studied cognitive bias, including the sunk cost bias, in case you want to read more about the topic. Kahneman won the Nobel prize for his work.   


How can you avoid falling into the sunk cost bias trap? Here are some ideas:

  1. Be aware that it exists and it affects more of our daily activities than we realize. 
  2. Track key performance indicators regularly so that you can see whether you’re on or off track. 
  3. Detach emotionally, if possible, from your business project.
  4. Set goals and milestones on your projects and have a “walk away” plan if things spiral out of control. 
  5. Stay future-focused. 


Now that you’re aware of sunk cost bias, you can be more mindful when making financial decisions. 

Our Latest Insight

Progress Billing vs. The Completed Contract Method

By Alisa McCabe • August 3, 2026
In the contracting world, where projects can span months or even years, managing cash flow and financial reporting is a unique challenge. Unlike traditional businesses that recognize revenue at the point of sale, contractors must choose how and when to account for their income and expenses. Two of the most common frameworks used to navigate this are Progress Billing (often paired with the Percentage of Completion Method ) and the Completed Contract Method (CCM). Progress Billing allows contractors to invoice clients and recognize revenue incrementally as milestones are met throughout the project. Completed Contract Method defers all revenue and expense recognition until the entire project is officially finished.  Selecting the right method goes far beyond basic bookkeeping; it fundamentally shapes your tax obligations, cash flow health, and how creditworthy your business appears to lenders and investors. This article breaks down the core differences between these two methods, explores their pros and cons, and helps you determine which strategy is the best fit for your business.

The Accounting Tech Stack We Rely On (and Why)

By Alisa McCabe • July 27, 2026
​Choosing new software can overwhelm any accountant. The options feel endless, and each one costs real time and money to test. Building the right accounting tech stack takes years of trial and error. We know, because we have spent over a decade doing exactly that. Our firm has been fully remote since 2012.  That means we have tested, rejected, and adopted these tools inside real client work. Here is the stack we trust, so you can skip the guessing. You will notice we left AI off this list. We use it where it helps, but that is a topic for another day.

Project Profitability Tracking for Consulting Firms: The Project Profitability Scorecard

By Alisa McCabe • July 20, 2026
For consulting firms, project profitability represents the critical margin between engagement revenue and the actual cost of delivery. This gap is fundamental; firms can be entirely booked yet face cash flow constraints if profitability isn't managed at the project level.  Project-level tracking is more than a financial formality; it is a strategic tool that enables leadership to optimize pricing, staffing, and capacity. To assist in this process, this guide introduces a practical framework: the Project Profitability Scorecard.

CONTACT US

Contact Us