The Three Stages in the Leadership Journey

I run a women’s business book club. This summer, one of our members introduced a fascinating idea: reading and discussing articles. The concept was simple—each person would present a summary of their chosen article and explore how its insights could be applied to both personal and business contexts. The article I’m bringing to the table is “The Leadership Odyssey” from The Harvard Business Review.


A phrase that has been echoing in my mind ever since I read the article is “what got you here won’t get you there,” and this article truly delves into that concept.


This piece deeply resonated with me because it aligns with where I currently stand on my journey and how I am viewing it. Gone are the days of the heroic leader charging ahead—the traditional image that often seems gender-biased towards men. In today’s landscape, women are carving out their place as effective leaders by acknowledging the importance of empowering those around us. We are stronger when we all rise together.

A Three-Stage Journey

The article outlines a three-stage journey: departure, voyage, and return.

Departure

The first stage, departure, is perhaps the most challenging. It’s that moment when you recognize, often through repeated teaching moments, that change is imperative. This is the stage where the phrase “what got you here won’t get you there” truly comes to life. It’s about realizing that the strategies and habits that brought you success in the past may not be the same ones that will lead you to becoming a great leader or successful business owner. This recognition often comes through feedback from colleagues and employees—a process that takes time and repeated instances to fully comprehend. Sometimes, finding a seasoned mentor with the skills you lack can serve as a model for the change you need.


However, this transformation usually demands external assistance, as it’s a more substantial effort than one might anticipate. An unbiased source, such as a coach, mentor, or advisor, can be invaluable in this journey. It’s about partnering with someone who guides you through this process of change.

Voyage

Once you’ve pinpointed the common thread among your issues and identified the behavior that needs alteration, you move on to the second stage—the Voyage.


In this phase, successful executives create a fresh learning context. They place themselves in situations where their authority is indirect, and they need to empower others without wielding traditional control. A collaborative style takes precedence over dictating and driving objectives. This new approach involves asking questions that steer conversations towards desired outcomes—an exercise in influencing without the traditional authority.


Another effective tactic during the Voyage is to transfer knowledge from other domains to your current situation. The article uses parenting as an example, highlighting the collaborative nature of raising a child—a challenge we’re all familiar with!


Enlisting the support of close colleagues who can point out when you exhibit the behaviors you’re trying to change is another strategy. These small wins, although they may encounter setbacks, are essential in the journey.

Return

The final stage, Return, is easily recognizable. You find comfort in situations that previously frustrated you. Your journey yields a new professional identity—an identity characterized by the transformation from practiced behavior to inherent traits. While the journey never truly concludes, it becomes self-sustaining.


Moreover, this newfound expertise fuels a desire to share your learnings, fostering growth in the workplace and beyond.


Embarking on this journey effectively begins with charting out a learning agenda. This plan illuminates the path towards behavior change and provides insights into the required effort. Ultimately, self-awareness is the cornerstone of successful change. Understanding who you are and acknowledging your insecurities can profoundly aid this transformation.


The “Leadership Odyssey” sheds light on the evolution of leadership. It speaks to a profound truth: to reach new heights, we must let go of what propelled us in the past. As we embrace this journey, it’s not just our roles that transform, but our identities as leaders and mentors.

Our Latest Insight


By Alisa McCabe • October 27, 2026
For project-based businesses, a healthy income statement can be dangerously deceiving. You might land a landmark contract and boast a record-breaking backlog, yet still find yourself scrambling to cover payroll by Friday. Why? Because in project-driven models, profitability and cash in the bank rarely move in sync. Between delayed milestone payments, scope creep, upfront vendor costs, and unpredictable client approval cycles, managing cash flow is a constant balancing act. A reliable cash flow forecast isn't just a nice-to-have financial report, it is your early warning system.  This comprehensive guide walks through the frameworks, metrics, and best practices required to master cash flow forecasting for project-based operations.
By Alisa McCabe • October 26, 2026
Selecting an accounting method is one of the most critical structural decisions a construction business will make. While cash accounting offers simplicity and direct visibility into liquidity, accrual accounting provides a far more accurate reflection of long-term operational health by matching revenues directly with the expenses incurred to earn them. Given the prevalence of progress billings, subcontractor payables, and inventory costs in construction, transitioning from cash to accrual (or managing a hybrid model) often becomes mandatory as revenue grows. This guide breaks down the key mechanics of cash vs. accrual accounting for contractors, IRS eligibility rules, and how each method impacts your financial reporting and bottom line. Understanding Cash vs Accrual Accounting At its core, the difference between cash and accrual accounting comes down to timing : specifically, when your business officially recognizes income and expenses on its financial statements. ​Cash Basis Accounting: Driven by Money Flow Under cash basis accounting , financial transactions are recorded only when actual money changes hands: Revenue is recognized when a client's payment lands in your bank account. Expenses are recognized when cash leaves your account to pay a supplier, subcontractor, or bill. Example: You complete a framing job in October and send a $15,000 invoice. The client pays you in December. Under cash accounting, that $15,000 counts as December revenue—it does not exist on your income statement in October or November. For small trade contractors or solo operators, cash accounting is attractive because of its simplicity. It gives a direct, real-time picture of how much spendable cash is in your bank account today. Accrual Basis Accounting: Driven by Activity & Earnings Under accrual basis accounting , transactions are recorded when they are earned or incurred , regardless of when money actually moves. This method follows the matching principle , pairing project revenues with the exact expenses required to generate them.  Revenue is recognized as soon as you complete work or issue an invoice (Accounts Receivable). Expenses are recognized as soon as you receive a subcontractor bill or order materials (Accounts Payable). Example: Using the same framing job above, the $15,000 is recognized as October revenue because that is when the work was performed and billed, even though the cash won't arrive until December. While accrual accounting requires closer tracking of receivables and payables, it delivers a much clearer picture of your company's true profitability and operational health.
By Alisa McCabe • October 15, 2026
​There is a frustrating stage of growth when the business makes more money and becomes harder to run. You expected growth to create leverage. Instead, your calendar is fuller and decisions take longer. Projects compete for the same people. Expenses become harder to explain. Accounting needs more information from Operations. Operations needs more information from Accounting. And the accounting systems that carried you to $2 million were not built for $15 million. Nothing necessarily looks broken. That is what makes this stage so deceptive. The processes that got you here may still work. Your people may still be good. Your customers may still be buying. What changed is the weight your existing structure is being asked to carry. At $2 million, you can still personally compensate for the gaps. Somewhere on the road to $5 million, $10 million, or $15 million, that stops being possible. The business did not suddenly become dysfunctional. It outgrew its dependence on informal coordination.  Part 5 of a 5-part series on the COO-Accounting relationship