Train, Trust, and Let Go: How Great Leaders Build Confident Teams
Don’t overinspect or oversupervise. Allow your leaders to make mistakes in training, so they can profit from the errors and not make them in combat.
-Col. Glover Johns
We had just hit the jackpot. A Chinese submarine crossed our path in an area where no one expected it to be. This should have been a massive win for U.S. intelligence, our ship, and us as SONAR technicians. But there was one problem: no one made the call. The submarine was only discovered in post-analysis days later. What should have been a career-defining success became a failure for our SONAR team due to hesitation and lack of confidence. One of my teammates saw the submarine—its frequencies matched, it behaved like a submarine, and all the indicators were there. But he didn’t speak up. He was afraid of being wrong.
When this failure came to light, our team had a meeting to figure out what went wrong. The teammate who had seen it was devastated. He felt like he had failed the entire crew. Our immediate supervisor didn’t help—he picked apart every mistake, repeatedly asking, “How could you miss this? I’ve shown you this a million times!” After a few minutes of this, his boss stepped in. He asked how we were being trained. The answer was obvious to all of us. Our supervisor was a doer, not a teacher. He couldn’t stand to see mistakes, so instead of letting us learn, he micromanaged and took over. The result? We lacked the confidence and knowledge to make decisions because we had never been trusted to.
At this point, you might think, “What a terrible leader!” And you’d be right—at least in this instance. But what you might not realize is that even good leaders fall into this trap. And you’re not immune to it either. If you have kids, I guarantee you’ve stepped in and done something for them because they were taking too long. If you run a business, you’ve likely taken over a task because you didn’t trust an employee to do it right. It feels like the right move in the moment, but it’s not. It is the easy way out. The answer is simple: real leadership requires patience. It’s easier to take over than to teach.
So how do we break this cycle? It takes discipline.
Step one:
provide the right training. No one becomes an expert overnight, but they need a foundation strong enough to work from. Encourage questions and never make people feel stupid for asking. If they’re afraid to ask, they’ll be afraid to act.
Step two:
let go. You have to trust the people you train. Set expectations clearly and then step back. Resist the urge to jump in.
Step three:
debrief. Go over the work. Point out successes and failures. Then, instead of just pointing out what went wrong, show them how to do better.
Follow these steps, and I guarantee you’ll build a team that has the knowledge and confidence to make the call.
Written by: Marc Chianese, CPA Candidate
Our Latest Insight
For project-based businesses, a healthy income statement can be dangerously deceiving. You might land a landmark contract and boast a record-breaking backlog, yet still find yourself scrambling to cover payroll by Friday. Why? Because in project-driven models, profitability and cash in the bank rarely move in sync. Between delayed milestone payments, scope creep, upfront vendor costs, and unpredictable client approval cycles, managing cash flow is a constant balancing act. A reliable cash flow forecast isn't just a nice-to-have financial report, it is your early warning system. This comprehensive guide walks through the frameworks, metrics, and best practices required to master cash flow forecasting for project-based operations.
Selecting an accounting method is one of the most critical structural decisions a construction business will make. While cash accounting offers simplicity and direct visibility into liquidity, accrual accounting provides a far more accurate reflection of long-term operational health by matching revenues directly with the expenses incurred to earn them. Given the prevalence of progress billings, subcontractor payables, and inventory costs in construction, transitioning from cash to accrual (or managing a hybrid model) often becomes mandatory as revenue grows. This guide breaks down the key mechanics of cash vs. accrual accounting for contractors, IRS eligibility rules, and how each method impacts your financial reporting and bottom line. Understanding Cash vs Accrual Accounting At its core, the difference between cash and accrual accounting comes down to timing : specifically, when your business officially recognizes income and expenses on its financial statements. Cash Basis Accounting: Driven by Money Flow Under cash basis accounting , financial transactions are recorded only when actual money changes hands: Revenue is recognized when a client's payment lands in your bank account. Expenses are recognized when cash leaves your account to pay a supplier, subcontractor, or bill. Example: You complete a framing job in October and send a $15,000 invoice. The client pays you in December. Under cash accounting, that $15,000 counts as December revenue—it does not exist on your income statement in October or November. For small trade contractors or solo operators, cash accounting is attractive because of its simplicity. It gives a direct, real-time picture of how much spendable cash is in your bank account today. Accrual Basis Accounting: Driven by Activity & Earnings Under accrual basis accounting , transactions are recorded when they are earned or incurred , regardless of when money actually moves. This method follows the matching principle , pairing project revenues with the exact expenses required to generate them. Revenue is recognized as soon as you complete work or issue an invoice (Accounts Receivable). Expenses are recognized as soon as you receive a subcontractor bill or order materials (Accounts Payable). Example: Using the same framing job above, the $15,000 is recognized as October revenue because that is when the work was performed and billed, even though the cash won't arrive until December. While accrual accounting requires closer tracking of receivables and payables, it delivers a much clearer picture of your company's true profitability and operational health.
There is a frustrating stage of growth when the business makes more money and becomes harder to run. You expected growth to create leverage. Instead, your calendar is fuller and decisions take longer. Projects compete for the same people. Expenses become harder to explain. Accounting needs more information from Operations. Operations needs more information from Accounting. And the accounting systems that carried you to $2 million were not built for $15 million. Nothing necessarily looks broken. That is what makes this stage so deceptive. The processes that got you here may still work. Your people may still be good. Your customers may still be buying. What changed is the weight your existing structure is being asked to carry. At $2 million, you can still personally compensate for the gaps. Somewhere on the road to $5 million, $10 million, or $15 million, that stops being possible. The business did not suddenly become dysfunctional. It outgrew its dependence on informal coordination. Part 5 of a 5-part series on the COO-Accounting relationship
